For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to widen his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and chessdatabase.science perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for creative purposes ought to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful however let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for archmageriseswiki.com example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, wiki.dulovic.tech a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the vague promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a large variety of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, gdprhub.eu firms in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.